Authorguy's Blog

On second thought

Posted on: June 26, 2010

I was going to do a third post in the Writing by the Numbers series, but I decided not to.  “Why?” you ask.

Well, for those of you who don’t know, I actually have a number of blogs, which is weird since I didn’t even want to have one, at the beginning.  That first blog, by the way, seems to have become something of an archive for all my blog posts elsewhere.  My publisher has a SciFi/fantasy/occult/psychic power/weird stuff blog, and a short story blog, that I occasionally post to as well.

So anyway, yesterday, when I posted the second article in the Writing by the Numbers series, I decided while I was there to check out some of the other blogs I like to follow, especially Writer Unboxed, which is a really good place to get lots of helpful advice on story-crafting issues.   Our topics overlapped, as one might expect.  The craft of writing is not that extensive.  The art of writing about the craft of writing is much more far-flung, every author born having their own take on the issue.

So yesterday, I posted about pantsing, and pantsing about pantsing.  Today I found an article at WU on much the same topic, but the author’s focus was actually about revisions and editing.  So here I am.  I just got finished doing extensive revisions on two novels, and I expect to get more, since I just contracted for four new short stories.  The thing is, that even though I am a pantser (squared), I generally don’t do much substantial revisions once my first draft is done.  Thanks to the marvelous technology of word processing, I can actually go back and do my revising as I go.  Yes there are blogs that advise against it, but what the hell.  I can’t write new text without reviewing old text, and if my old text doesn’t give me good ideas for new text I have to change it.

‘Substantial’, however, does not include that variety of revision I call the Great WAS Hunt, or its relatives, the WERE, HAD, and THAT Hunts.   Believe me, those are more than enough.  Changing the verb changes the sentence, and everything around it has to be changed.  Sometimes this is all to the good, and leads to a more substantial revision, as I mentioned in this post, but mostly I spend a lot of time trying to keep the meaning the same while changing the words.  In this sense it’s more a matter of editing than revision, but it sure feels like revision.


1 Response to "On second thought"

WAIT a minute, I’m still revising my comments on your take on revisions and stuff. For me, revisions are the blood of the work, be it short or long or in between. I have a friend, a fellow author, who does all his revising in his head, then sits down and write the novel. I might add parenthetically, they are damn good novels too.

His revisions come at the behest of his agent and editor. Few. Me, I like to knock out the story fast and revise, revise, revise.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Unbinding the Stone

A Warrior Made

A Warrior Made

Click here to BUY NOW!

St. Martin’s Moon

St. Martin's Moon

Click cover to Buy Now!


Chasing His Own Tale

Click Here to Buy Now!

Struck By Inspiration

Struck By Inspiration

Click here to Buy Now!

Steampunk Santa

Click here to Buy Now!

Bite Deep

Christmas among the vampires!

Click Here to BUY NOW!

Click here to buy NOW!

Cyber-pirates. Sort of.

Click here to BUY NOW!

Off the Map

Reality TV...without the Reality!

Author Guy’s Tweets

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 618 other followers

What has gone before

Blog Stats

  • 8,779 hits
%d bloggers like this: